Here are some of my favorite videos and essays to bust common anti-Christmas myths.
MYTH 1. The date of December 25th for Christ’s birth comes from a pagan Roman festival; usually suggested as Sol Invictus or Saturnalia.
Since many a Grinch finds that reading things that contradict their prejudices makes their head hurt, let’s start with two videos debunking the Saturnalia and Sol Invictus myths on Christmas:
Saturnalia Explained: (From the ReligionforBreakfast Youtube channel)
Did Christmas Copy the Sun God’s Birthday?:
Calculating the birth date of Christ:
Via the date of his death-
There was an ancient belief that prophets die on the anniversary of their conception. Since Jesus died on Passover, then nine months forward will bring you to December, if you are using the Roman Julian calendar of the early church fathers when calculating dates for these events. (For an example, see Sextus Julius Africanus {c. 160AD to c. 240AD} who gave a date of March 25, 1BC for the Incarnation of Jesus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sextus_Julius_Africanus#Further_reading )
Via the date of the Annunciation of Mary-
From: Why Christmas is not Pagan, by Fr. Geoff Harvey on Sun, 16/12/2018
“Ancient Christian writers built the timing for the birth of Christ from the Scriptural observation that Zechariah (the father of John the Baptist) was on duty on Yom Kippur (September 23). This observation comes from the information we find in the gospel of Luke.
“Once when Zechariah’s division was on duty and he was serving as priest before God, he was chosen by lot, according to the custom of the priesthood, to go into the temple of the Lord and burn incense. And when the time for the burning of incense came, all the assembled worshipers were praying outside. Then an angel of the Lord appeared to him, standing at the right side of the altar of incense. When Zechariah saw him, he was startled and was gripped with fear.But the angel said to him: “Do not be afraid, Zechariah; your prayer has been heard. Your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you are to call him John.He will be a joy and delight to you, and many will rejoice because of his birth,for he will be great in the sight of the Lord. He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even before he is born.He will bring back many of the people of Israel to the Lord their God.And he will go on before the Lord, in the spirit and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the parents to their children and the disobedient to the wisdom of the righteous—to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.”
The day of Yom Kippur is the day in which incense was offered in this manner.
Based on this observation, Christians were able to calculate the birth of John the Forerunner as being September 23 + 270 days = June 24. They then observed that the Annunciation of Christ’s birth was six months after John the Baptist’s conception.
“In the sixth month [of Elizabeth’s pregnancy] the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth, to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. And the virgin’s name was Mary” (Luke 1:26–27).
Calculating September 23 and adding six months brings us to March 25. Through this reasoning, the Greek Bishop Irenaeus (c. 130AD – c. 202 AD) had established March 25 as the date of the Annunciation before the end of the second century. The Annunciation was being celebrated long before Christmas, since the Annunciation was miraculous, whereas the birth was a mere function of human biology.
The date of December 25 is therefore derived from the date of Jesus’ conception.
By the year 221 AD, three Christian writers had independently calculated the date of Jesus’ birth as December 25. Irenaeus, as we have just said, identified the date of his annunciation before the end of the second century. Hippolytus used a different method, but determined December 25 as the date of the Nativity in 202 AD when he wrote his commentary on Daniel 4:23. Finally, Sextus Julius Africanus, in writing his “Chronology of the World” in 221 AD had also calculated December 25 as the date of Christ’s birth.
Full essay at: https://www.thegoodshepherd.org.au/why-christmas-not-pagan
Roman Emperor Aurelian established the cult of Sol Invictus as an official religion in AD 274.
Meanwhile, St. Hippolytus said in his commentary on Daniel (written ca. AD 202-211) that Jesus’ birthdate is December 25.
MYTH 2: The Christmas tree has pagan origins.
ON CHRISTMAS TREES:
In Western Europe-
The Very Recent Origins of the Christmas Tree: It’s often alleged that the Christmas tree originated from some sort of pagan practice. But the evidence points to a much later date during the Medieval period in Europe.
In Eastern Orthodox Europe- (From: Why Christmas is not Pagan, by Fr. Geoff Harvey. https://www.thegoodshepherd.org.au/why-christmas-not-pagan)
“It is usually said that the custom of the Christmas tree is foreign and western. But a manuscript in the British Museum from the 13th century informs us that in 512 AD the Emperor Anastasios I built a church at the Monastery of Saint Gabriel in Tur Abdin in northern Syria. Among other dedications, he offered “…two large brass trees which stood on both side of the Beautiful Gate of the sanctuary. On the leaves of the trees, there was a place for lights to flicker. Each tree had one hundred and eighty lamps and fifty silver chains from top to bottom. On these hung small objects of gold, silver or copper, as well as red eggs, vases, animals, birds, crosses, wreaths, bells, carved grape bunches, discs…”
Paul the Silentiary (c. 563 AD) in his Ekphrasis of Hagia Sophia in Constantinople and Ekphrasis from the Ambon of Hagia Sophia, describes in detail the lights of the icon screen and the pulpit of the Great Church. On the architrave of the icon screen, there were metal cone-shaped trees, like a pine tree or a cypress of tender foliage, where instead of fruits they had conically shaped lights. This document even records that illuminated crafted trees (tree-like chandeliers) were placed throughout the Church. This is a description of Hagia Sophia’s Christmas trees.
Christmas tree practice is also documented in the study of the late professor of Byzantine Archaeology at Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Constantine Kalokyris, titled, “Sacred Trees and the Eastern Origin of the Christmas Tree.” Here he reveals that the custom of the Christmas tree is not foreign or western European but Byzantine and Orthodox!
Our Christmas tree is not derived from the pagan yule tree. Rather, from the Paradise Tree, adorned in honour of Adam and Eve. The Christmas tree is completely biblical in origin.”
MYTH 3: Santa Claus is based on the Norse god Odin.
SANTA CLAUS VS ODIN:
Odin isn’t Santa Claus: There’s really no good reason to think jolly old Saint Nick is based on the Norse god Odin. By Jackson Crawford, Ph.D.:
I plan on doing another of these posts before Easter, so if you enjoyed this please come back around that time.
Merry Christmas,
Bill McGrath
PS: Here are two excellent explanations of the difference between Western and Orthodox calendars and the celebrations of Christmas and Easter.
From the Catholic perspective:
From the Orthodox perspective:
PPS: If you enjoyed this post, you may also enjoy this 55 minute movie I found while researching these subjects.
(NOTE: Previously published as “Corrupting the Good, the True & the Beautiful”)
I’ve been hearing about a book from my fellow conservatives for the last few years that analyzes the Social Justice movement: “The Rise of Victimhood Culture: Microaggressions, Safe Spaces, and the New Culture Wars” by sociologists Bradley Campbell and Jason Manning. (1)
The Premise of the book is that a third culture has recently been added to the two most common historically, the Honor and Dignity cultures. This new culture is engendered by modern social justice warriors, which the authors call the “Victimhood Culture.” It selects elements of both Honor culture (speed at taking offense ) and Dignity culture (resort to law, rather than violence ) and combines them in ways that fit the goals of the modern SJW cadre.
While this new culture is a modern construct and is based on the principles of that specific variant of Marxism which came from the Frankfurt School of 1920s Germany (2), the underlying concept is far older.
Therefore, the idea I wish to put forth in this essay is that this “Victimhood” culture has its roots, as in all traps of the Enemy, in some element palatable to human nature; or else the bait would not be attractive to its intended victims.
As Frodo says in The Return of the King “The Shadow that bred them (orcs) can only mock, it cannot make: not real new things of its own.”
Or, as some put this principle: “Evil cannot create. It can only corrupt.”
HISTORY
One of the central tenets of Communism is expressed as: “From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs.” -Karl Marx, 1875 Critique of the Gotha Programme.
This concept did not originate with Marx though, as we can trace its roots to earlier socialist writers, then to Pre-revolutionary France, then to earlier Puritan settlements in North America, (3) and all the way back to a misreading of the voluntary acts of charity of the early Christians in Jerusalem immediately after Pentacost. (4)
Many have noted that this idea of giving according to your attributes combined with receiving according to your needs, cannot work beyond a single family unit, as it requires a voluntary self-sacrifice rarely found beyond familial bonds. (5)
What makes the concept so palatable though, is that it is so familiar. It is how most people experienced family economics for most of human history. The father, historically the breadwinner of the family, brought home the food and the mother distributed it fairly among the children, based on their needs at the time. (6)
As Dr. Jordan Peterson explains in the video below, this historical distribution task may be one reason why Social Justice Warriors are likely to be female:
DEFINITIONS
So, if we can trace the modern Victimhood Culture to its roots in Marxist doctrine, can we go deeper and clarify what legitimate human desire the bait in the trap seeks to emulate?
If the first two categories of human cultures are the Honor Culture and the Dignity Culture, what shall we call the third?
Aristotle wrote of the concept of three “souls” within mankind. (7)
The “Sensible” soul processes the senses of the body. This is also the source of emotions and passions. We will call this soul “The Heart.”
The “Rational” soul would involve the higher functions of the human mind. This is the intellect. The rational, logical mind. We will call this soul “The Head.”
The “Nutritive” soul controls the subconscious functions of the body and its basic appetites. It is concerned with the meeting of immediate needs, rather than delaying gratification to meet long term goals. Because the ancient Romans would say of an undisciplined person that they, “think with their belly,” we will call this soul “The Belly.” (8)
Note: Readers of Aristotle may notice that I have arranged his list of souls differently to the order usually given. This is due to my assigning each “Soul” as a definer of a culture.
Here then are my descriptions of the three cultures, along with their historical and modern representatives.
Honor/Heart Culture: “Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.” – C.S. Lewis.
Historically, this seems to be the default human culture. However, the larger and more stratified a society became, the more this culture becomes the domain of the ruling elite. (Note: In the 21st century, the honor culture has almost entirely disappeared as a binding force on our own ruling elite).
Icons: The young male warrior. Spartans. Samurai. Knights. Apache. Maasai. Zulu.
Identifiers: Patriarchal. High value on societal reputation and respect. The duel is how “questions of honor” are settled. Merit based reward system. Loyalty to tribe/clan/family before all else. Emphasis on the tools and skills needed for acquiring resources.
Historical* Positive attributes: Physical courage. Respect for truth and keeping one’s word. Stays within strict rules of courtesy to avoid violence. (* I used the preface “Historical” for this section, because many positive attributes of traditional honor cultures are uncommon in their modern, First World equivalents).
Negative Attributes: Easily insulted. Easily resorts to violence. Political systems: Historical warrior societies. Democracy. Anarchy.
Note: An interesting intellectual exercise can be had by comparing the Medieval codes of Chivalry (9) with the 18th century Code Duello (10).
Dignity/Head Culture: “Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding.” – Proverbs 4:7
With a few exceptions*, this culture came about relatively recently in human history; as stable governments with consistently applied laws became more wide spread. (* the exceptions include the high points of classical Jewish, Athenian, Roman and Chinese cultures).
Icons: Grandparents. Mentors. Teachers. Philosophers. Identifiers: Patrician. Noble. The highest virtues in this society are wisdom, self-restraint and forgiveness. Decisions are based on experience and logic. Positive attributes: Value of every human life. Ethic of restraint and tolerance.Trial by laws.
Emphasis on saving excess resources for troubled times. Legacy based reward system. Negative attributes. Overly cautious. Prone to long deliberation when immediate action is needed.
Political systems: A Republic or Monarchy.
Mercy/Belly Culture: “Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy.” -Matthew 5:7
Icons: Historic-The Young Mother. Modern-The Social Justice Warrior. Identifiers: Matriarchal. Focus on eliminating immediate, visible discomfort of those under their care. Emphasis on equal distribution of resources. Relationship based reward system. Positive attributes. Nurturing. Fair. Charitable. Negative attributes: Envious. Bureaucratic. Seeking an equality of outcome, rather than an equality of opportunity. Social or Political systems: Nuclear Family. Socialism/Communism.
***
This essay is intended to be an ongoing effort with input from my wiser and more learned friends. Please contribute as you see fit.
Regards,
Bill McGrath
NOTES:
1.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rise_of_Victimhood_Culture
2. https://archive.schillerinstitute.com/fid_91-96/921_frankfurt.html
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_each_according_to_his_ability,_to_each_according_to_his_needs
4. https://tifwe.org/resource/does-acts-2-5-teach-socialism/
5. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-rise-and-disastrous-fall-of-the-kibbutz
6. There are basic behavioral differences between the male and female of every mammalian species on this planet; including Homo sapiens, A.K.A. we human beings. If you want to understand the behavioral differences between men and women, you should know that we spent the majority of our history in hunter-gatherer societies and it was the differing survival needs of these two groups that explains much of the differences between male and female psychology and physiology. For more on this subject, read “Men are from Mars and Women are from Venus.” https://www.amazon.com/Men-Mars-Women-Venus-Understanding/dp/0060574216
7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Soul
8. To see Aristotle’s concept of three souls used in modern fiction, read the section on “The Heroic Trinity” in my essay on Hierarchy vs Equality. https://theswordoffire.com/?page_id=595
9. https://theswordoffire.com/?page_id=316
10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_duello
Comments Off on UNDERSTANDING HONOR, DIGNITY & MERCY CULTURES
I’ve been hearing about a book from my fellow conservatives for the last few years that analyzes the Social Justice movement: “The Rise of Victimhood Culture: Microaggressions, Safe Spaces, and the New Culture Wars” by sociologists Bradley Campbell and Jason Manning. (1)
The Premise of the book is that a third culture has recently been added to the two most common historically, the Honor and Dignity cultures. This new culture is engendered by modern social justice warriors, which the authors call the “Victimhood Culture.” It selects elements of both Honor culture (speed at taking offense ) and Dignity culture (resort to law, rather than violence ) and combines them in ways that fit the goals of the modern SJW cadre.
While this new culture is a modern construct and is based on the principles of that specific variant of Marxism which came from the Frankfurt School of 1920s Germany (2), the underlying concept is far older.
Therefore, the idea I wish to put forth in this essay is that this “Victimhood” culture has its roots, as in all traps of the Enemy, in some element palatable to human nature; or else the bait would not be attractive to its intended victims.
As Frodo says in The Return of the King “The Shadow that bred them (orcs) can only mock, it cannot make: not real new things of its own.”
Or, as some put this principle: “Evil cannot create. It can only corrupt.”
HISTORY
One of the central tenets of Communism is expressed as “From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs.”
-Karl Marx, 1875 Critique of the Gotha Programme.
This concept did not originate with Marx though, as we can trace its roots to earlier socialist writers, then to Pre-revolutionary France, then to earlier Puritan settlements in North America, (3) and all the way back to a misreading of the voluntary acts of charity of the early Christians in Jerusalem immediately after Pentacost.(4)
Many have noted that this idea of giving according to your attributes combined with receiving according to your needs, cannot work beyond a single family unit, as it requires a voluntary self-sacrifice rarely found beyond familial bonds. (5)
What makes the concept so palatable though, is that it is so familiar. It is how most people experienced family economics for most of human history. The father, historically the breadwinner of the family, brought home the food and the mother distributed it fairly among the children, based on their needs at the time. (6)
As Dr. Jordan Peterson explains in the video below, this historical distribution task may be one reason why Social Justice Warriors are likely to be female:
DEFINITIONS
So, if we can trace the modern Victimhood Culture to its roots in Marxist doctrine, can we go deeper and clarify what legitimate human desire the bait in the trap seeks to emulate?
If the first two categories of human cultures are the Honor Culture and the Dignity Culture, what shall we call the third?
Aristotle wrote of the concept of three “souls” within mankind. (7)
The “Sensible” soul processes the senses of the body. This is also the source of emotions and passions.
We will call this soul “The Heart.”
The “Rational” soul would involve the higher functions of the human mind. This is the intellect. The rational, logical mind.
We will call this soul “The Head.”
The “Nutritive” soul controls the subconscious functions of the body and its basic appetites. It is concerned with the meeting of immediate needs, rather than delaying gratification to meet long term goals.
Because the ancient Romans would say of an undisciplined person that they, “think with their belly,” we will call this soul “The Belly.” (8)
Note: Readers of Aristotle may notice that I have arranged his list of souls differently to the order usually given. This is due to my assigning each “Soul” as a definer of a culture.
Here are my descriptions of the three cultures, along with their historical and modern representatives.
HONOR, DIGNITY & MERCY CULTURES
Honor/Heart Culture: “Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.”
– C.S. Lewis.
Historically, this seems to be the default human culture. However, the larger and more stratified a society became, the more this culture becomes the domain of the ruling elite. (Note: In the 21st century, the honor culture has almost entirely disappeared as a binding force on our own ruling elite).
Icons: The young male warrior. Spartans. Samurai. Knights. Apache. Maasai. Zulu.
Identifiers: Patriarchal. High value on societal reputation and respect. The duel is how “questions of honor” are settled. Merit based reward system. Loyalty to tribe/clan/family before all else. Emphasis on the tools and skills needed for acquiring resources.
Historical* Positive attributes: Physical courage. Respect for truth and keeping one’s word. Stays within strict rules of courtesy to avoid violence.
(* I used the preface “Historical” for this section, because many positive attributes of traditional honor cultures are uncommon in their modern, First World equivalents).
Negative Attributes: Easily insulted. Easily resorts to violence.
Political systems: Historical warrior societies. Democracy. Anarchy.
Note: An interesting intellectual exercise can be had by comparing the Medieval codes of Chivalry (9) with the 18th century Code Duello (10).
Dignity/Head Culture: “Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding.”
– Proverbs 4:7
With a few exceptions*, this culture came about relatively recently in human history; as stable governments with consistently applied laws became more wide spread. (* the exceptions include the high points of classical Jewish, Athenian, Roman and Chinese cultures).
Identifiers: Patrician. Noble. The highest virtues in this society are wisdom, self-restraint and forgiveness. Decisions are based on experience and logic.
Positive attributes: Value of every human life. Ethic of restraint and tolerance.Trial by laws.
Emphasis on saving excess resources for troubled times. Legacy based reward system.
Negative attributes. Overly cautious. Prone to long deliberation when immediate action is needed.
Political systems: A Republic or Monarchy.
Mercy/Belly Culture: “Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy.”
-Matthew 5:7
Icons: Historic-The Young Mother. Modern-The Social Justice Warrior.
Identifiers: Matriarchal. Focus on eliminating immediate, visible discomfort of those under their care. Emphasis on equal distribution of resources. Relationship based reward system.
Positive attributes. Nurturing. Fair. Charitable.
Negative attributes: Envious. Bureaucratic. Seeking an equality of outcome, rather than an equality of opportunity.
Social or Political systems: Nuclear Family. Socialism/Communism.
***
This essay is intended to be an ongoing effort with input from my wiser and more learned friends. Please contribute as you see fit.
6. There are basic behavioral differences between the male and female of every mammalian species on this planet; including Homo sapiens, A.K.A. we human beings. If you want to understand the behavioral differences between men and women, you should know that we spent the majority of our history in hunter-gatherer societies and it was the differing survival needs of these two groups that explains much of the differences between male and female psychology and physiology. For more on this subject, read “Men are from Mars and Women are from Venus.” https://www.amazon.com/Men-Mars-Women-Venus-Understanding/dp/0060574216
7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Soul
8. To see Aristotle’s concept of three souls used in modern fiction, read the section on “The Heroic Trinity” in my essay on Hierarchy vs Equality. https://theswordoffire.com/?page_id=595
9. https://theswordoffire.com/?page_id=316
10. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_duello
Comments Off on Corrupting the Good, the True and the Beautiful
This series began by contrasting High Fantasy (epitomized by the works of C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien) with the classic works of Hard Science Fiction, as each genre provides a good foil for the other.
It also began with a simple distinction between fantasy and sci-fi; as the former containing a supernatural element and the later having none. But is this distinction precise enough when we are looking to define High Fantasy and in particular the High Fantasy of Tolkien and Lewis?
In my layout for this series I knew that this last installment would be about the Supreme Being (God, as described in Judeo-Christian scriptures), and in particular, the views on this subject in the writings of Lewis and Tolkien; as this is one of the main defining elements of a High Fantasy story. (see parts 1 through 6 for the other elements).
The Good God vs the “gods”
All of the best fantasy stories, be they about the ultimate war between good and evil or the doings of the smallest of fantasy creatures, really say the same thing and suggests to the reader (whether consciously or not) the same ultimate conclusion: If the smallest of supernatural things exists, even if it is the smallest of fairies, then perhaps the greatest of supernatural things (God) exists. But High Fantasy is much more than this.
The defining characteristic of God in the works of Tolkien and Lewis is not His power, but His goodness and mercy. The reverse is true of the small “g” gods of many other fantasy genres.
Epic Fantasy (such as Game of Thrones) or Sword and Sorcery (such as Conan the Barbarian) have supernatural beings, but these “gods” merely have more power than the mortals of the story and are their equals in morality. These gods are as chaotic in their actions as an earthquake and as corrupt in their morals as the lowest of mortal men. (For more on this, see the gods of the ancient Greeks or Norse).
High Fantasy is different though. Every High Fantasy story that says justice will prevail in the end, is really saying that the universe is ruled by a God of Justice. Every High Fantasy story in which mercy is the “secret weapon” that turns the tide, is saying that the Supreme Ruler of the Universe is a God of Mercy.
J.R.R. Tolkien, in his essay On Fairy-stories writes:
“But the ‘consolation’ of fairy-tales has another aspect than the imaginative satisfaction of ancient desires. Far more important is the Consolation of the Happy Ending. Almost I would venture to assert that all complete fairy-stories must have it. At least I would say that Tragedy is the true form of Drama, its highest function; but the opposite is true of Fairy-story. Since we do not appear to possess a word that expresses this opposite—I will call it Eucatastrophe.(1) The eucatastrophic tale is the true form of fairy-tale, and its highest function. The consolation of fairy-stories, the joy of the happy ending; or more correctly of the good catastrophe, the sudden joyous “turn” (for there is no true end to any fairy-tale): this joy, which is one of the things which fairy-stories can produce supremely well, is not essentially “escapist,” nor “fugitive.” In its fairy-tale — or otherworld — setting, it is a sudden and miraculous grace: never to be counted on to recur. It does not deny the existence of dyscatastrophe, of sorrow and failure: the possibility of these is necessary to the joy of deliverance; it denies (in the face of much evidence, if you will) universal final defeat and in so far is evangelium, giving a fleeting glimpse of Joy, Joy beyond the walls of the world, poignant as grief.
How did we loose hope?
I’ve seen fans of both fantasy and sci-fi describe the differences between the two genres as “Fantasy shows you the universe as you wish it to be, while Sci-Fi shows you the harsh reality of the universe as it is.” However, as I was writing this series , I began to see this “harsh reality” worldview as underlying a large percentage of modern fiction.
The seeds of this worldview were planted in 19th century philosophies of Marx and Nietzsche, grew during the horrors of World War I and bore its literary fruit with the “Lost Generation”(3) of influential writers of the inter-war period.
Two writers of this generation were of course C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien. Both men fought and were wounded in WWI and both men suffered great personal loss as children prior to the war ( Tolkien lost his father to rheumatic fever at three years of age and his mother to diabetes at twelve, while Lewis’s mother died from cancer when he was ten). Having survived the death of a parent when children and then a world war as young adults, they did not write stories of “harsh reality,” but of hope, mercy and miracles.
The great question of course, is how were Tolkien and Lewis able to do this when so many other writers with similar tragedies in their backgrounds did not? How did they keep their faith (in the case of Tolkien) or regain their faith (as in the case of Lewis), when so many other writers of their time reacted to such tragedies with bitterness and nihilism? Why did so many writers of the 20th century become, not just agnostics on the question of God, but militant and angry atheists? (10)
Tolkien remained a devout Catholic throughout his life, in part, according to his biographer, out of love for his devout mother.
Lewis lost his faith after his mother died, (4) but found it again through a long process of logical inquiry, his love of myths and the help of some learned friends.
Compare these two men with the writer called the “Anti-Lewis,” Philip Pullman. (5) Like Lewis and Tolkien, Pullman lost a parent when young. In Pullman’s case, his father died in a plane crash of his RAF bomber while serving in Africa when Pullman was seven years of age. When Pullman was 44 years old, his mother died and he came upon some information in her papers that lead him to believe that his father had deliberately crashed his plane and committed suicide. Three years later he began work on his novel “Northern Lights,” the first novel in his series “His Dark Materials.”
Lewis, Tolkien and Pullman all lost parents at a young age. Tolkien kept his faith, in part, out of reverence to his devout mother, Lewis lost his faith after his mother died, but regained it, with the aid of his friends Tolkien and Hugo Dyson. Meanwhile, Pullman went down a very different path.
Although Pullman has stated he is “a Church of England atheist, and a 1662 Book of Common Prayer atheist, because that’s the tradition I was brought up in”, he has also said he is technically an agnostic. He has singled out elements of Christianity for criticism: “if there is a God, and he is as the Christians describe him, then he deserves to be put down and rebelled against.” He has also acknowledged that the same could be said of all religions. Pullman has also referred to himself as knowingly “of the Devil’s party”, a reference to William Blake’s revisionist view of Milton in The Marriage of Heaven and Hell.
Pullman said in an interview, “I’m trying to undermine the basis of Christian belief.” (6) and in 2010 published the novel, “The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ.”
For more on the novels of Philip Pullman and his attacks on religion (and specifically on Christianity), read the essay at REASON magazine: (7)
For answers to some of the criticisms of the Narnia series by Pullman, see the links in note 8.
“The demand of the loveless and the self-imprisoned that they should be allowed to blackmail the universe: that till they consent to be happy (on their own terms) no one else shall taste joy: that theirs should be the final power; that Hell should be able to veto Heaven….Either the day must come when joy prevails and all the makers of misery are no longer able to infect it: or else for ever and ever the makers of misery can destroy in others the happiness they reject for themselves.”
― C.S. Lewis, The Great Divorce
High Fantasy, Hope & Mercy:
Frodo and Gandalf discussing all the evil that Gollum has done;
“What a pity that Bilbo did not stab that vile creature, when he had a chance!’
‘Pity? It was Pity that stayed his hand. Pity, and Mercy: not to strike without need. And he has been well rewarded, Frodo. Be sure that he took so little hurt from the evil, and escaped in the end, because he began his ownership of the Ring so. With Pity.’
‘I am sorry,’ said Frodo. ‘But I am frightened; and I do not feel any pity for Gollum.’
‘You have not seen him,’ Gandalf broke in.
‘No, and I don’t want to,’ said Frodo. ‘I can’t understand you. Do you mean to say that you, and the Elves, have let him live on after all those horrible deeds? Now at any rate he is as bad as an Orc, and just an enemy. He deserves death.’
‘Deserves it! I daresay he does. Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends. I have not much hope that Gollum can be cured before he dies, but there is a chance of it. And he is bound up with the fate of the Ring. My heart tells me that he has some part to play yet, for good or ill, before the end; and when that comes, the pity of Bilbo may rule the fate of many – yours not least.”
We see this theme of mercy over and over in High Fantasy; the mercy shown Gollum by Bilbo, Frodo, Gandalf, Aragorn and Faramir allows Gollum to be present at the Crack of Doom and inadvertently save the quest at the end. In The Chronicles of Narnia, Aslan’s merciful sacrifice for Edmond’s sake was part of a “deeper magic” used to defeat the White Witch. In the Harry Potter series, it’s Harry’s mercy to Peter Pettigrew that saves Harry from death and it’s Dumbledore’s mercy towards Draco Malfoy that saves the boy from loosing his soul.
God vs ‘gods”
In the climatic chapter of Lewis’s The Silver Chair, the witch called The Green Lady is trying to stop the escape of her prisoner, Prince Rilian, by casting a spell upon the prince and his rescuers, saying that there is no such place as Narnia, no such a thing as the sun in the sky and no such a creature as Aslan:
The Prince and the two children were standing with their heads hung down, their cheeks flushed, their eyes half closed; the strength all gone from them; the enchantment almost complete. But Puddleglum, desperately gathering all his strength, walked over to the fire. Then he did a very brave thing. He knew it wouldn’t hurt him quite as much as it would hurt a human; for his feet (which were bare) were webbed and hard and cold-blooded like a duck’s. But he knew it would hurt him badly enough; and so it did. With his bare foot he stamped on the fire, grinding a large part of it into ashes on the flat hearth. And three things happened at once. First, the sweet heavy smell grew very much less. For though the whole fire had not been put out, a good bit of it had, and what remained smelled very largely of burnt marsh-wiggle, which is not at all an enchanting smell. This instantly made everyone’s brain far clearer. The Prince and the children held up their heads again and opened their eyes. Secondly, the Witch, in a loud, terrible voice, utterly different from all the sweet tones she had been using up till now, called out, “What are you doing? Dare to touch my fire again, mud-filth, and I’ll turn the blood to fire inside your veins.” Thirdly, the pain itself made Puddleglum’s head for a moment perfectly clear and he knew exactly what he really thought. There is nothing like a good shock of pain for dissolving certain kinds of magic.
“One word, Ma’am,” he said, coming back from the fire; limping, because of the pain. “One word. All you’ve been saying is quite right, I shouldn’t wonder. I’m a chap who always liked to know the worst and then put the best face I can on it. So I won’t deny any of what you said. But there’s one more thing to be said, even so. Suppose we have only dreamed, or made up, all those things-trees and grass and sun and moon and stars and Aslan himself. Suppose we have. Then all I can say is that, in that case, the made-up things seem a good deal more important than the real ones. Suppose this black pit of a kingdom of yours is the only world. Well, it strikes me as a pretty poor one. And that’s a funny thing, when you come to think of it. We’re just babies making up a game, if you’re right. But four babies playing a game can make a play-world which licks your real world hollow. That’s why I’m going to stand by the play world. I’m on Aslan’s side even if there isn’t any Aslan to lead it. I’m going to live as like a Narnian as I can even if there isn’t any Narnia. So, thanking you kindly for our supper, if these two gentlemen and the young lady are ready, we’re leaving your court at once and setting out in the dark to spend our lives looking for Overland. Not that our lives will be very long, I should think; but that’s a small loss if the world’s as dull a place as you say.”
Narnia- The Silver Chair: Puddleglums Heroic Speech
[ For more on Lewis and his Narnia series, read note 9. ]
Compare the speech Lewis writes for Puddleglum to the one Robert E. Howard’s character Conan the Barbarian gives in the story “Queen of the Black Coast” (written in 1934, two years before Howard’s death by suicide).
“I have known many gods. He who denies them is as blind as he who trusts them too deeply. I seek not beyond death. It may be the blackness averred by the Nemedian skeptics, or Crom’s realm of ice and cloud, or the snowy plains and vaulted halls of the Nordheimer’s Valhalla. I know not, nor do I care. Let me live deep while I live; let me know the rich juices of red meat and stinging wine on my palate, the hot embrace of white arms, the mad exultation of battle when the blue blades flame and crimson, and I am content. Let teachers and priests and philosophers brood over questions of reality and illusion. I know this: if life is illusion, then I am no less an illusion, and being thus, the illusion is real to me. I live, I burn with life, I love, I slay, and am content.”
In George R.R. Martin’s “Game of Thrones” there are many ‘gods’, which do show powers and miracles throughout the show.
Game Of Thrones Season 2: Religions Of Westeros
George R. R. Martin on FIRE & BLOOD, and magic in his books
It is plain that neither Robert E. Howard or Martin R.R. Martin believed in the magic, sorcery or religions depicted in their stories. These elements for them were merely common literary tools used in the construction of many fantasy tales. They serve the same purpose as the superpowers of the heroes and villains of comic books and the alien races of many sci-fi stories. They are simply plot devices used to increase the stakes for the characters. The main goal of these authors is to tell a story that will sell well and are using tools from their imagination to tell them. They do not believe in the existence of these tools in the real world.
Lewis and Tolkien and other High Fantasy authors are different though. Yes, they are using made up tools, but the underlying beliefs and values behind their tales are ones they truly believe in.
Tolkien sums up the purpose of fantasy stories thus:
“I would venture to say that approaching the Christian Story from this direction, it has long been my feeling (a joyous feeling) that God redeemed the corrupt making-creatures, men, in a way fitting to this aspect, as to others, of their strange nature. The Gospels contain a fairy-story, or a story of a larger kind, which embraces all the essence of fairy-stories. They contain many marvels—peculiarly artistic, beautiful, and moving: ‘mythical’ in their perfect, self-contained significance; and at the same time powerfully symbolic and allegorical; and among the marvels is the greatest and most complete conceivable eucatastrophe. The Birth of Christ is the eucatastrophe of Man’s history. The Resurrection is the eucatastrophe of the story of the Incarnation. This story begins and ends in joy. It has pre-eminently the ‘inner consistency of reality’. There is no tale told that men would rather find was true, and none which so many skeptical men have accepted as true on its own merits. For the Art of it has the supremely convincing tone of Primary Art, that is Creation. To reject it leads either to sadness or wrath.
But in God’s kingdom the presence of the greatest does not depress the small. Redeemed Man is still man. Story, fantasy, still go on, and should go on. The Evangelium has not abrogated legends; it has hallowed them, especially the ‘happy ending’.”
2. It is the supernatural elements in the first Star Wars trilogy that made it a fantasy story. Once the “Midi-chlorians” entered the story in episode 1 of the prequels, as a “natural,” (rather than supernatural), explanation for Jedi powers, Star Wars left the fantasy genre and leaned more towards sci-fi.
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Generation
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._S._Lewis
5. Philip Pullman’s biography:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Pullman
8. There is a difference between the classical equality of opportunity and the modern Left’s equality of outcome and we see this in the negative reviews of Lewis’s The Last Battle, specifically on the question of Susan’s fate at the end of the story. Some critics say that Susan did not enter Narnia at the same time as the other children because she grew up and became interested in sex, but Lewis never says this.
Lewis, in two letters to children on the subject of Susan, writes: “The books don’t tell us what happened to Susan. She is left alive in this world at the end, having by then turned into a rather silly, conceited young woman. But there is plenty of time for her to mend, and perhaps she will get to Aslan’s country in the end—in her own way.”
also “Not because I have no hope of Susan ever getting to Aslan’s country, but because I have a feeling that the story of her journey would be longer and more like a grown-up novel than I wanted to write. But I may be mistaken. Why not try it yourself?”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Pevensie
There is a good discussion about Susan on the Narniaweb group:
9. “What Aslan meant when he said he had died is, in one sense plain enough. Read the earlier book in this series called The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, and you will find the full story of how he was killed by the White Witch and came to life again. When you have read that, I think you will probably see that there is a deeper meaning behind it. The whole Narnian story is about Christ. That is to say, I asked myself ‘Supposing that there really was a world like Narnia and supposing it had (like our world) gone wrong and supposing Christ wanted to go into that world and save it (as He did ours), what might have happened?’ The stories are my answers. Since Narnia is a world of Talking Beasts, I thought He would become a Talking Beast there, as He became a man here. I pictured Him becoming a lion there because (a) the lion is supposed to be the king of beasts; (b) Christ is called ‘The Lion of Judah’ in the Bible; (c) I’d been having strange dreams about lions when I began writing the work. The whole series works out like this.
The Magician’s Nephew tells the Creation and how evil entered Narnia. The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, the Crucifixion and Resurrection. Prince Caspian, restoration of the true religion after corruption. The Horse and His Boy, the calling and conversion of a heathen. The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, the spiritual life (especially in Reepicheep). The Silver Chair, the continuing war with the powers of darkness. The Last Battle, the coming of the Antichrist (the Ape), the end of the world and the Last Judgment.
– C.S. Lewis in a 1951 letter to a young fan.
10. Here is one possible cause of the “angry atheist” syndrome. Working for thirty years in the NY state court system, I have seen a reoccurring theme among emotionally and spiritually wounded people of many types. Wounds suffered in childhood have a lasting effect and the deeper the wound the more severe the effect and the more difficult it is to heal.
In the case of deliberate wounds caused by human action, such as mental, physical or sexual abuse, some of those abused as children grow up to be abusers themselves and some go the extreme opposite direction. One common thread though among those who did not heal is extreme anger, sometimes at the type of person who abused them, sometimes at the type of person they themselves were at the time of their abuse and sometimes at the system represented by the abuser.
The Quest for Pity and Mercy in Tolkien’s Middle Earth. Woody Wendling.
https://pillars.taylor.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1116&context=inklings_forever
How to publish your own book inexpensively
(AKA The Down and Dirty Guide to Self-Publishing )
by William McGrath, author of The Sword of Fire trilogy
(This article was originally published in 2012. Prices mentioned have probably changed since then)
Here are the steps I went through to publish my own books. Perhaps you will find some information that you can apply to your own situation.
My first novel is titled Asulon. It is part of a fantasy trilogy called The Sword of Fire, (in a nutshell, the three books tell the story of the Great Tribulation and the return of Jesus Christ, setting these events in a world that resembles Europe and the Middle East during the Crusades).
I first tried the usual route of submissions to both mainstream and Christian publishers and received the usual round of rejections that an unsolicited, unagented author usually receives. I then tried finding an agent (both mainstream and Christian), but struck out there as well. The feedback I was getting was that the book was too overtly Christian for mainstream publishers and did not fit the guidelines of the larger Christian publishers, (too violent, had characters who drank wine with their meals – a big no no with many old school evangelicals).
I then began researching the idea of publishing the book myself.
There are two types of printing technologies used by book publishers, offset and digital. Offset was the main process used for many years and is the modern version of Guttenberg’s technique. It is how large publishers print most of their books. Unfortunately the startup cost is high. I found that to have my 296 page book printed at a competitive unit price using this method would require a print run of at least 1,000 copies. This would bring my unit price down under $4.00 per book, but the $4,000 total was more than I was willing to budget for printing.
The other method of printing is digital (much like a Xerox copy). With this process you can print just one book if you wish and very low print runs are affordable. This is sometimes referred to as Print-on-Demand (POD), but that more accurately describes the process of sale rather than the method of printing.
If you do a Google search for POD publishers, you will find a myriad of companies offering this service. Most of these are middle men who will charge you high upfront fees to do what you can do for yourself if you deal directly with a printer. Most of these companies really make their money on their up front fees to authors, not from books sold. Lulu.com and CreateSpace.com are two exceptions, having no or low up front fees, but they make up for this by charging higher unit costs. More on this later.
For an example of someone’s experience with a high up front POD service, I know a retired NY State judge who paid $4,000 to a POD company to publish his book. This was for their typesetting, editing and marketing help. I can’t comment on the first two, but all their marketing amounted to was sending out letters to local churches soliciting speaking engagements for the judge, at which he would lecture on the subject of his book and sell the book afterwards. I saw him recently. Three years after publishing, he still has not sold enough books to break even on the deal. When I published my own books I cut out the middleman and dealt directly with a digital printing company called Lightning Source, Inc. (LSI). LSI charged a $40 setup fee and then charged me $4.80 per copy for my novel Asulon in 6″ x 9″ trade paperback size. Asulon sells on Amazon.com for $9.99
LSI charges Amazon (and other retailers) $7.99 for each book and I receive $3.20 from each sale, which LSI sends me every 90 days. I also sell my books on my own website packaged with a martial art DVD for $20, which includes shipping to U.S. addresses. After I pay for shipping and the blank DVD, I make a profit of more than $5.00 per book/DVD package. (Note: this book/non-book item package deal is a great selling tool. One of the first books on Frisbees was packaged inside a full sized Frisbee. Even though this package was more expensive than its book competitors it far outsold them). LSI is a division of Ingram Group, the largest book distributor in the US. This gives me automatic inclusion on retail websites like Amazon.com, Target.com and B&N.com (Barnes & Noble). If you do a Google search for Asulon McGrath you will find all the many places online that my book is sold all over the world and, with the exception of my own websites, all this was set up automatically by LSI through Ingram. Here are some other items you’ll need to self-publish your book. Copyright: You should copyright your book with the US Copyright Office (or the equivalent if publishing outside the U.S.). You download the form from the US Copyright office and pay a small fee to file. You can even send them copies of your book on CD or file electronically. ISBN (International Standard Book Number). This is the 13 digit number that identifies your book. Bowker Inc is the official U.S. broker for ISBNs. You can buy one ISBN from Bowker for $100, but most self publishers find it more economical to buy a block of 10 numbers for $250 (you do have more than one book in you, right?). Beware of POD publishing services that offer a single ISBN at a price lower than Bowker’s. Despite what they imply in their advertising, these numbers are registered to them and are nontransferable. Therefore they will be listed as the official publisher, not you. ISBNs are not transferable, so if you leave that service you will have to get a new ISBN.
NOTE: If you don’t plan on selling through bookstores or Amazon, B&N, etc, (on your own website, for example) then you can get by without an ISBN.
Another thing you may not need, (depending on the laws in your state) is to incorporate. I set up my own publishing company simply by filing a DBA (Doing Business As) form for $40 at my County Clerk’s office. This was to allow me to go to my bank and set up a business account so people can write their checks to my DBA rather than to my own name. It just sounds more professional to have a book published by PTI Press, rather than by the author himself. Different states have different laws regarding setting up a business, but if you sell solely through the LSI (printer) – Ingram (distributor) – Amazon.com (retailer) connection, you probably don’t need a business name, corporation or often even a business license. In addition, if you print with LSI and let Amazon, B&N, etc, handle the retail sales for you, then you don’t have to collect and file sales taxes. The internet retailers will do all that for you and LSI will send you your check from the wholesale profits every three months. LSI requires that you send the text of your book to them as a PDF file using the professional version of Adobe Acrobat. I have MS Word 2003, which won’t do PDF conversions (Word 2007 does do conversions, but I’ve heard it is a not as good as 2003 in other areas). If you do not have Acrobat or the Word 2007, you can subscribe to Adobe’s online PDF creator service for $10 a month: https://createpdf.adobe.com/ There is no long term commitment. You can sign up for one month, convert your book docs and then not renew at the end of the month. $10 for as many conversions you can do in a month is a pretty good deal.
While it’s not economical to use most of these POD services for general sales, services which have no up front fees (such as Lulu.com) are a good choice to print a few review copies for peer critiques and do a rewrite or two before offering the book for general sale. Lulu, the least expensive of the popular POD services, is still more expensive than going directly to a digital printer like LSI on unit cost. Here is a comparison of unit costs using my own novels Asulon and Eretzel as examples. Remember, LSI’s set up fee of $40 ($75 if you factor in the required proof copy for your first printing of a title) is not factored in to the prices shown below.
Asulon 296 pages: Lulu $10.42 per copy. LSI $4.80 per copy.
Eretzel 448 pages: Lulu $13.46 per copy. LSI $7.24 per copy.
Therefore, it is best to use Lulu for print runs of 12 or less and not for full publishing. By the way, the reason Lulu is more expensive than LSI is because Lulu doesn’t print the books themselves, they hire LSI to do it and then sell you the books at a mark up (your cost per copy at Lulu is actually higher than the full retail price for each book at Amazon.com if you print directly with LSI). Lulu isn’t the only one. From what I’ve heard, LSI seems to be the printer of choice for most POD companies.
Createspace (CS), a division of Amazon.com, is another POD service that is getting a lot of attention these days. Both LSI and CS will charge about the same per copy, but since CS has an option of a lower upfront charge, it will cost you a little less per copy than LSI for your first printing in small numbers. LSI’s volume discount will help bring their unit cost (even with their upfront charges factored in) under CS’s if you buy enough units. However, keep in mind that Createspace/Amazon will take a much larger percentage of your profits than LSI if you use them for Amazon sales. Let’s look at a book that costs $4.80 to print and has a retail list price of $9.99. The publisher can set the wholesale price discount that retailers pay at both LSI and at CS, however the lowest discount you can set at CS is only 40% while the lowest discount at LSI is 20%. Using LSI at a 20% discount, the wholesale price that retailers are charged for a book with list price of $9.99 is $7.99. With CS’s 40% discount, Amazon.com would be charged $5.99. If you the publisher are charged $4.80 in printing costs per copy, you would make $3.20 if printing with LSI and only $1.19 if you print with CS when selling on Amazon.com. Another thing to consider is that Createspace, as a division of Amazon.com, will not sell to other online booksellers such as Barnes and Noble. LSI, is a division of Ingram (the largest book wholesaler in the world) and therefore sells to all the booksellers that Ingram does (google my novel Eretzel and see all the outlets around the world that the book is sold). If you do use Createspace, just use their basic printing service (no ISBN or marketing) and set your selling option to “Private Access” so you are the only one who can buy your book from them. (Note: Reviews I’ve seen for Createspace are a mixed bag on quality compared to LSI, especially regarding cover art and binding).
UPDATE: Several things have changed since I wrote this page regarding the differences between using Lightning Source (now Ingramspark) and Createspace. Here are some pages with more current info:
These are not set up as links. Copy and paste them into a search bar to find them.
https://1106design.com/2015/04/ working-createspace-lightning-source-michelles-conversation-author-philip-burley/
Covers: I did my own book covers in PhotoShop 6 after my artist sent me the cover art. You can download a cover template from LSI to center everything correctly for your page count, page size and paper type. Take a look at the cover for Asulon: http://www.theswordoffire.com/978-0-9801058-0-3_COVER%20copy.jpg
You’ll find my first cover for Asulon here: http://inosanto.com/?cat=21 (scroll to the bottom of the page). It’s just something I put together with PhotoShop before I found an artist I could afford.
I’m no computer genius. If I can do a workable book cover, so can you.
Look at the covers of these two best sellers. These are covers anyone can do with a minimum knowledge of PhotoShop or other photo editing software:
http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/c/susanna-clarke/jonathan-strange-and-mr-norrell.htm
http://z.about.com/d/bestsellers/1/0/P/7/-/-/jurassic_park.jpg
By the way, when you looked at the back cover for Auslon did you notice that the box for the bar code was blank? Bar codes can be a bit complex to put on your cover – the printing company requires specific fonts and the right kind of black (in the world of printing, there is more than one kind of black). The easy way to get around this, if you are using LSI as your printer, is to leave a blank white box of the right size where the bar code should be and LSI will create one for you and place it there.
Once you have written your book, had it proofread and edited, you will still need to typeset it properly. A good typesetting program will make the text flow better on the page and handle issues such as justification, hyphenation, page numbering, etc. Adobe’s InDesign is the industry standard in typesetting software, but it’s a bit costly. There are alternatives such as Scribus which is an open source software product that has a good reputation among self-publishers. I tried the trial version of InDesign and then Scribus, but found both programs had too steep a learning curve for my over 40 year-old brain, so I typeset my novels in MS Word 2003. Word is not really designed for this, but you can push it a bit and get it to do a decent job with the detailed instructions you’ll find in a book called Perfect Pages. You can see the final results in my novel Asulon by clicking on its cover (to use Amazon’s Look Inside option) and viewing some sample pages of text.
Ebooks: Many experts predict that ebooks will soon comprise 50% of total book sales. If you are publishing a book, you really should include an ebook version. I separated my ebook publishing into two categories, Kindle in one and all other formats in the other. A good place to start the process is at Smashwords.com Follow their style guide carefully. This will help get your Word doc ready for any ebook conversion service you use. Because you can go directly through Amazon.com for their Kindle reader (and choose to receive 70% of the retail price of the ebook), I uploaded the converted file directly to them. It took a few days for the ebook to show up on Amazon.com, then a few days after that for the ebook’s page to be linked to the page for the paperback version, and finally, about three weeks after I started, for all the reviews to be copied over from the paperback to the ebook’s page.
For sales through other ebook sellers (Barnes & Nobel, Sony, Kobo, Diesel), I used Smashwords.com as many of the ebook sellers require you to go through an aggregator such as Smashwords, instead of dealing directly with them. Smashwords has an excellent royalty split and pays you 85% of the list price when a customer buys your ebook directly from their website and 60 to 70% when your ebook is purchased on a site such as iBooks, Kobo, the Nookstore, etc.
If you have followed the Smashwords style guide correctly, then you can upload your Word doc to them and Smashwords will handle the ebook conversion for you. Most of the online companies selling ebooks will get your book from Smashwords without hassle. The only minor complication I had was Apple’s requirement regarding ISBNs. The ISBN is the number that identifies your book. The US Copyright office requires that the ebook edition have a different ISBN than the paper version. For all the other companies that Smashwords works with, having the ISBN listed on the copyright page of your book is sufficient: however to appear on Apple’s iBooks store for its popular iPad device, you will also need to register your ISBN on a separate page at Smashwords. Not a big hoop to jump through and it will take you just a minute to enter the data. Once you have registered and uploaded your book at Smashwords, go to your Dashboard and then the “Channel Manager” page to register the ISBN. You can also decide which channels you want Smashwords to sell to there. I choose not to have Smashwords distribute to Amazon since I uploaded my Kindle books directly to Amazon.
Once your own book is properly formatted and converted to Mobi for Kindle, upload to Amazon through their own service. Go to any Amazon book page (for example the page for my ebook Asulon: http://www.amazon.com/ASULON-SWORD-FIRE-ebook/dp/B003YOSEWK ) and scroll down to the bottom of the page and click “Self Publish with us”. Once there the second choice will be publishing on Kindle.
Ebook Conversions: I used Jim Brown’s service Jim & Zetta for my Kindle conversion and have received compliments from other ebook publishers on how well the books were formatted for Kindle. Jim has the best prices in the business I’ve seen and still manages to have excellent customer service.
The last piece of advice I have for you is to network, network, network. The professional editor I hired for Asulon was my largest expense for that book. By the time my second novel Eretzel was ready for publishing, I had made contact with another author through one of the newsgroups listed below. He edited my second novel for a fraction of the cost of my first. Both editors had similar educational backgrounds and degrees, both produced good results. The only difference was cost.
I’ve enclosed a list of newsgroups on the web and printed books that have helped me with writing, publishing and promoting my books.
Regards,
Bill McGrath
Author of The Sword of Fire series
PS. If you found this information helpful and would like to thank me, please buy my books. The Amazon.com pages for my books: http://www.amazon.com/ASULON-William-R-McGrath/dp/0980105803 http://www.amazon.com/ERETZEL-WILLIAM-RAYMOND-MCGRATH/dp/0980105811
My YouTube channel (free advertising for my books, videos and seminars) http://www.youtube.com/user/TuhonBillMcg
COPYRIGHT AND ISBN
US COPYRIGHT OFFICE http://www.copyright.gov/
Bowker http://www.bowker.com/
http://www.bowker.com/index.php/component/content/article/1/2
NETWORKING SOURCES
Christian Fiction Review Blog http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CFRB/ Christian fic2 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Christian_fic2/ CHRIST-SF http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ChristSF/ SELF-PUBLISHING http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Self-Publishing/
POD PUBLISHERS http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/pod_publishers/
POD Blog (a good overview of digital printing can be found here)
http://www.fonerbooks.com/pod.htm
PUBLISHING FOR PROFIT blog (an informative blog from an publishing insider)
http://gropenassoc.com/blog/
The Reference Desk section of their website is also very useful.
PREDATORS AND EDITORS ( The place to learn who are the good guys and bad guys in the publishing world)
http://www.anotherealm.com/prededitors/
BOOKS (My “must have” list-they explain what you need to know about self-publishing, marketing and selling your books)
Self-Editing for Fiction Writers by Renni Browne and Dave King (you’ll still need another set of eyes to go over your work, but this will help keep the amateur mistakes to a minimum)
Eats, Shoots and Leaves by Lynne Truss (the funniest book on punctuation you will ever read. You may even learn something in the process)
Book Design and Production by Pete Masterson (after you write your book, you still have to put it together)
The author’s website ( http://www.aeonix.com/ ) is a great place to find info on all aspects of self-publishing:
Aiming at Amazon (A must have if you are going to sell your book on Amazon.com and other internet retailers) http://www.amazon.com/Aiming-Amazon-Publishing-Marketing-Amazon-com/dp/093849743X
Perfect Pages by Aaron Shepard (typesetting a book in MS Word) MS Word is not the best way to typeset a novel, but I found that I could produce a decent product with the help of this book (besides, the real typesetting programs like InDesign, TeX or Scibus were way over my technologically challenged head anyway) http://www.amazon.com/Perfect-Pages-Publishing-Microsoft-Desktop/dp/0938497332/ref=pd_sim_b_1
POD For Profit is Aaron Shepard’s latest book. The subtitle explains it well.
More on the NEW Business of Self Publishing, or How to Publish Your Books With Online Book Marketing and Print on Demand by Lightning Source
http://www.newselfpublishing.com/ is Aaron Shepard’s blog. Great info here.
PLUG YOUR BOOK by Steve Weber (my favorite book on internet marketing) http://www.amazon.com/Marketing-Authors-Publicity-through-Networking/dp/0977240614/ref=pd_sim_b_5
The Self-Publishing Manual by Dan Poynter (Poynter is the dean of POD printing. A good book to start with, though not as up to date on internet marketing as Plug Your Book) http://www.amazon.com/Self-Publishing-Manual-Write-Print-Sell/dp/1568600887
Many of the personalities of the characters in my novels are broadly based on the seven spiritual gifts listed in the 12th chapter of Paul’s letter to the Romans (1).
Why, you might ask? Well, back in the late 1970’s, right before I started working on my novels, I heard a lecture on how these gifts could also be seen as personality types. In describing these gifts/personalities, I realized how many people I knew fit into these categories and began to use these personality types as basic templates for the characters in my novels.
I have found this seven types (or hearts) concept to be a useful character development tool for my writing. It helps me get inside the head of a character whose personality is different from my own and write them as realistically as possible. However, this is still a work in progress, so please feel free to send me your suggestions on how I can improve this concept.
.
I describe each personality in four ways:
1. By the job I think best fits this type (especially as it pertains to my fantasy novels).
2. The element or object I use in my novels as a symbol for this type.
3. Famous people with this personality.
4. Their chief motivators or personality traits.
As you read my list of famous people who fit each type, you will notice that there is no correlation between personality type and the person’s politics: i.e. not all soft hearted people are Liberals and not all wise people are Conservatives (although it helps 🙂 ). The Seven Hearts idea is more about the natural personality that a person has at birth, and not the environment that the person grows up in. It should also be noted that modern psychology lists anywhere from five to sixteen basic personality types, but I find the seven based on the Romans 12 list of gifts works well for a writer like myself to build my characters around.
.
At the end of this article, I’ve included my observations on which personality type seems to do best in marriage when matched with the right complementary type.
.
The names of the seven personality types I use in my novels are:
Warrior/Fire.
Leader/Iron.
Teacher/Earth.
Merchant/Gold.
Physician/Water.
Helper/Wind.
Scribe/Paper.
THE 7 HEARTS:
.
1. Warrior/Fire: (This is the gift of Prophecy in Romans 12).
John the Baptist and Samson are both good examples in the Bible. In history we find Theodore Roosevelt, General George S. Patton and Winston Churchill. In more modern times we find Muhammad Ali and many pro boxers and MMA fighters. Prime examples from Hollywood are John Wayne, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Samuel L. Jackson and R. Lee Ermey. (Most movie stars seem to be either this personality type or the Physician/Water type). In literature Edmund Rostand’s character Cyrano de Bergerac is an excellent example of this type. Most prophets in the Bible were probably of this type (especially the ones who were killed for their blunt speaking of the truth).
.
Warrior/Fire people are strong willed, aggressive, outspoken, stubborn, courageous and disciplined. They have a desire to dominate and be the boss. They often have a real need to be the center of attention and/or tell people their opinions on things. Warriors have little or no filter between their heart and their mouth. They are quick to anger, but quick to cool off. They can be abrasive and dogmatic, and are often not well liked by people not in their inner circle; but they are the ones you want on your side in a fight. You often hear their family say that they would make a good drill sergeant, whether they are in the service or not. One of the reasons R. Lee Ermey did such a convincing job in Full Metal Jacket; (besides being a former Marine drill instructor himself) was a personality well suited for the job. While Warrior types are capable of getting the troops in shape, they usually are not the ones you want deciding if we should go to war in the first place; as they are better at executing policies than they are at developing wise ones. However, they can do well in leadership positions if they learn how to delegate authority and to listen to those with more experience in a specific area. Once they are taught what the “right” way to do something is though, it is nearly impossible to change their mind.
.
People with a Warrior personality often have a commanding voice and a persistence that demands your attention (whether you wish to give it or not :-). While they may not appear to care, this is partially due to their ability to bottle up their “softer” emotions when they need to get a tough job done. However, many do scale low on the empathy scale. Think of this as a talent they need to be effective warriors and survive the psychological aftermath of war. It would not surprise me to learn that this personality type has the lowest incidence of PTSD in combat veterans and while the Physician types have the highest.
A great book to help understand this personality type is Seal Team Six founder Richard Marcinko’s autobiography “Rogue Warrior.”
.
A common phrase from the Warriors I know is, “This is just the way I am. Deal with it.”
.
In my Sword of Fire (SOF) novels the following characters are Warrior/Fire types:
Moor, the Etruscan swordmaster and Gath, eldest of the Anakim.
.
2. Leader/Iron: (This is the gift of Ruling in Romans 12)
Joshua and Nehemiah in the Bible. George Washington. Ronald Reagan. Lt. Gen. Harold G. Moore.
.
Leader/Iron people have natural leadership skills and inspire confidence in those they lead. They are capable of making quick decisions based on gut instinct and still manage to get it right. Leaders are by nature very respectful of authority and often spend a good percentage of their careers as second in command, learning their craft. King Arthur in the 1981 movie Excalibur was a good example of this type, as is Aragorn in The Lord of the Rings novels. (Not so much in the LOTR films though. Jackson’s Aragorn was not the same decisive decision maker as was Tolkien’s original writing of that character). Two good books to understand this personality are Lt. Gen. Harold G. Moore’s We Were Soldiers Once and Young and Hal Moore on Leadership: Winning when Outgunned and Outmanned. (There are also good videos of Moore on Youtube that will help you understand this personality type).
.
While the Warrior/Fire type makes a good drill sergeant, the Leader makes a good commanding officer, president or, in fantasy novels like my own, king. Their strength lies in knowing how to rally and inspire the troops. They lead from the front and by setting a good example, but they won’t take your load from you as a Helper/Wind personality would.
Because they have such a high respect for authority, the leader can take it personally when their own authority is questioned. Leaders should guard against taking care of those loyal to them a little too well and to treat everyone by the same rules. In my experience, leaders often look like leaders. They often have good looking, yet strong faces. In a word, they look noble.
.
SOF characters: Argeus, father of Daniel. Eleazar, second eldest of the Anakim.
.
3. Teacher/Earth: (This is the gift of Exhortation in Romans 12)
King Solomon, the Apostle Paul and St. Luke in the Bible. Benjamin Franklin and Abraham Lincoln in history. Author C.S. Lewis.
.
A Teacher desires wisdom, loves learning and enjoys teaching. This type is called the Gift of Exhortation in Romans 12, as they enjoy encouraging others. Teachers would rather prevent a problem before it occurs than try to solve it after it has grown large. They are capable of making wise decisions, if enough time is taken to analyze a problem and get good counsel from other personality types who can see things from other angles or perspectives. The saying “A fool learns from his own mistakes, but a wise man learns from the mistakes of others,” was probably written with teachers in mind.
While a Warrior/Fire person can be a great orator and make you believe something, a Teacher can be a great communicator and help you understand it.
.
When giving advice, a Teacher will often show a practical, real life example of the principle they are talking about. However, they are often the absent-minded professor type and may get so focused on solving the problems of tomorrow that they forget about the needs of today.
That nerdy science teacher or history professor you had in school who really enjoyed teaching and made the class both fun and interesting was probably this personality type.
.
SOF characters: Daniel, prince of Asulon. Isolde’, Daniel’s mother. Dvorah, wife of Nathan. Abishai, third eldest of the Anakim. (And, if you haven’t already guessed, me).
.
4. Merchant/Gold: * (This is the gift of Giving in Romans 12)
In the Bible, Joseph, the son of Isaac. In modern times we find Bill Gates, Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton and many self-made millionaires and billionaires; especially if they are true philanthropists.
.
Just as the Leader knows the right time to put men into battle, the Merchant knows the right time to buy and sell and how best to use his money as his troops. Put into any environment, the Merchant will find a way to make a successful business no matter what.
.
While this type has the skills to make a business succeed, they also have a real desire to do good works with their money. A Merchant must remember though not to get so focused on their business that they neglect their family. Sam Walton is said to have taken a six week vacation each year with his family to help make up for the time he spent away from them while focused on his business. A good book to help understand this type is The Millionaire Next Door, by Thomas J. Stanley.
.
SOF character: Benaiah, fifth eldest of the Anakim.
.
5. Physician/Water: (This is the gift of Mercy in Romans 12)
Abraham and Moses in the Bible. Comedian Robin Williams. President Jimmy Carter, Author J.R.R. Tolkien. Singer Paul McCartney.
.
Physician types are merciful, softhearted, and empathetic. Diplomatic to a fault, they are slow to anger, (but once angered, look out!). They hate conflict and will avoid making a tough decision if they can. They are usually a “people person” and feel a strong need to be liked by those around them. They usually start out shy when young, but often have interesting ways of managing this (I find that many comedians and actors are of this type). Their moods can be a bit of a rollercoaster ride though and they can be susceptible to bouts of melancholy. Their high empathy levels mean that they can not bear to see anything suffer and most of my family and friends who have been vegetarians are of this personality type.
.
Physicians will often have some level of artistic ability and most Physicians I know can draw well or have some other creative ability. On a side note: I have a theory that much of the ugliest of the modern art we see today is caused by visually “tone deaf” Warrior types looking for attention; not the naturally artistic Physicians, whose empathy and humility help them understand and emulate what is beautiful.
Physician types are often physically attractive (when an actor/actress is not a Warrior, the odds are very good that they are a Physician). Physicians are capable of being very skilled and intelligent in their professions and, at the same time, are often not very wise when it comes to their personal relationships (more on this in the marriage section below).
When you meet someone in the medical field who is both very competent and truly kind hearted, they are usually a Physician/Water type.
.
SOF characters: Simon the priest. Nathan, brother of Rachel. Shammah, youngest of the Anakim.
. 6. Helper/Wind: (This is the gift of Ministry in Romans 12)
Mary, the mother of Jesus. Laura Bush, wife of George W. Bush.
(I don’t have many famous people to list here. Helpers tend to stay away from center stage and get things done behind the scenes).
.
This type wants to help others in practical ways. Helpers like to keep their hands busy and see to the needs of today. A good worker. Helpers are often not very exiting, but have a steady, even-tempered, affectionate and cheerful personality. The default setting on their face is a smile. Scout leaders, the moms who make all the kids costumes for the school play, the dads who repair all the kids bikes in the neighborhood, are often this type of personality. The nicest, most helpful of your elementary school teachers was probably this personality type. Helpers have a hard time saying no to requests and can get overworked or taken for granted. The ones I’ve known tend to be a bit on the plump side, but have an amazing long term endurance when it comes to work, if it helps others. I choose the term “Wind” to describe them in my novels, not thinking of a tornado, but more like a gentle, pleasant breeze. The character of Sue Heck on the TV show The Middle, is written as a Wind person.
.
SOF characters: Rachel, princess of Eretzel. Uriah, fourth eldest of the Anakim.
.
7. Scribe. Paper: * (This is the gift of Teaching in Romans 12. Note: the word “teacher” here infers a “teacher of the Law” ie a teacher of the Laws of Moses, as Paul was writing to Jewish converts to Christianity who lived in Rome).
.
Those with this personality like order and things put neatly in their place. As the name implies, Scribes can make a good recorder of information, such as a file clerk, proofreader or a librarian. However, they often get so focused on details that they forget the big picture. Scribes usually don’t make good supervisors, as they can make dotting every “i” and crossing every “t” in their paperwork a priority over the primary needs of the job. They can become legalistic, capable of telling you what the letter of the law is, but not its spirit. Think of them as a human reference book. However, they can do very well working long hours putting things in order in a way that would bore everyone else.
SOF charater: Asahel, the sixth oldest of the Anakim.
.
*Note: You may notice that I am a bit thin in describing the Merchant/Gold and Scribe/Paper types, since I know very few librarians and no self-made millionaires. If you recognize yourself among these types, especially if you are a self-made millionaire 🙂 and find that I have gotten something wrong, or at least given an incomplete picture of this type, please feel free to email me with your corrections.
.
RESPECTING THE TYPES:
The one common trait among most of these personality types is that if you ask each of them what one thing humans need more of to improve society, they would each say that it is the attribute that they either have or desire most. So if you ask each type to complete the sentence, “The world would be a better place, if people would…”
The Warrior would say “Say what you mean and mean what you say.”
The Leader would say “Inspire those around them to do their best.”
The Teacher would say “Take the time to research what causes a problem, so they can understand how to prevent it.”
The Merchant would say “Be more generous with what they have.”
The Physician would say “Have more compassion for one and other and all living things.”
The Helper would say “Help each other with daily burdens.”
The Scribe would say “Have more order in their lives.”
.
In my experience, the stronger personalities often have a tendency to look down on the other types (or at least their attributes) while the softer types will say they just can’t understand why everyone doesn’t share their priorities. The exception to this are the wise Teachers. We (insert modesty emoji here) understand that it takes different tools to do different jobs well.
.
OPPOSITES ATTRACT (usually):
I have a set of seven brothers in my novels who are attracted to seven sisters. Each of the brothers and each of the sisters have one of the seven personalities. Here’s how I play matchmaker in my novels between the personality types.
Leader with Physician.
Teacher with Helper.
Merchant with Scribe.
Warrior with Warrior.
.
In the first three match-ups I have a “harder” personality matched up with a “softer” type, but in truth each personality complements the other as each is strong where the other is weak.
Is the Leader inspiring and disciplined? Then match them up with a Physician who can feel sad at all the pain in the world and needs an emotional lift from someone they can admire. Does the Leader harbor deep emotional wounds in the aftermath of a battle in which they lost troops? Feelings that they can’t show to those they lead, lest the remaining troops loose courage? Then pair them up with an empathetic healer like a Physician. (If on a real battlefield far from home, then talking to a counsellor or confessor who is a Physician type can also bring healing for the Leader).
Can the Teacher be forgetful of day to day tasks? Then pair them up with a Helper, who will focus on these things and allow them to study and work. Does the Helper have a hard time saying no to requests? Then pair them up with a Teacher, who likes to think an action through to its logical conclusion and then nip the problem in the bud while still small and easily dealt with.
Can the Merchant spend so much time on growing their business that they neglect day to day expenses or go too far out on a limb with their investments? Then pair them up with a Scribe, who is a natural inventory person, accountant and all around bean counter. Does the Scribe have a tendency to be a hoarder of things or a miser with money? Then partner them with a Merchant who knows how to make investments grow and whose generosity will rechannel the Scribe’s instinct to keep things in order into one that researches where their charitable giving will do the most good.
.
The exception to this paring of opposites in my novels is the Warrior/Fire personality.
In real life, it seems that Warrior/Fire person usually marries a Physician/Water person (believing that this personality is the only one patient enough to put up with them-and they may be right!). However, the Warrior type usually ends up bullying the softer personality to some extent, if not physically, then emotionally. From my experience with family, friends and acquaintances with this personality, the Warrior is the type whose marriage most often ends in divorce. When a Warrior marriage does work, it seems that the most successful matches have been Warrior with Warrior. If they can survive the early days of the marriage, then a mutual respect develops into a functional and equal partnership.
(You can read more on how these personalities interact in a courtship setting in my second novel, Eretzel).
.
Note: I should remind you that all of this is just my theory of what the most compatible personalities are in marriage. This is not written in stone and I have seen many good and successful marriages that don’t fit these parameters. Keep in mind there are many other factors that effect compatibility that are missing here, such as a person’s religion, their politics, their family culture, their I.Q. and even their birth order among their siblings. These will all have an effect and are not addressed here. Even if I am right with these recommendations, it only means that these are potentially the smoothest roads, not the most interesting to travel on. If you are not in a relationship that matches these parameters, you can still use these guidelines to help your relationship by understanding what are the strengths of what type your partner is “ideally” compatible with and try to develop those strengths and use them when needed to help your relationship.
.
So, what are your thoughts on these different personalities? Do you recognize yourself in any of these seven archetypes? What did I get right and (more importantly) what did I get wrong? Please contact me though this page and let me know what you think.
Regards,
Bill McGrath
(1)Note: Romans 12:6-8 King James Version (KJV) 6Having then gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us, whether prophecy, let us prophesy according to the proportion of faith; 7 Or ministry, let us wait on our ministering: or he that teacheth, on teaching; 8 Or he that exhorteth, on exhortation: he that giveth, let him do it with simplicity; he that ruleth, with diligence; he that sheweth mercy, with cheerfulness.
Comments Off on SEVEN HEARTS: A character study for fiction writers
Long ago in an ancient city there were two beggars named Cain and Abel. Both men were crippled, but Cain was crippled in both his legs while Abel was crippled in just one.
In this city there was a pool of water around which was built a stone portico, for this kept the water shaded and cool.
It was said that every so often an angel would come and stir the water with his finger and that the first one who touched the water after this would be granted his heart’s desire.
Now Cain and Abel would stay near this pool to rest in the shade of the portico and to beg from the people coming there. Many times the waters of the pool would stir and many times Cain and Abel would hurry as best they could to the water’s edge, each wishing to be healed of their infirmity and each time Abel, with his one good leg, would get to the pool first. But each time the stirring of the water was caused by the wind, not by an angel, so Abel was left a cripple. Even though Abel was not healed, Cain began to hate Abel, envying him his one good leg which gave him such an advantage.
“It’s not fair, not fair at all,” thought Cain, cursing Abel in his heart.
One day the king came into the city to make a sacrifice there. Both Cain and Abel knew that the king would pass by a street not far from the pool, but it was only Abel who left to go beg along the route the king would take.
“It is well enough for Abel to go beg along the street. He can use a crutch to stand upon, while I will be too low to be seen by the king,” thought Cain bitterly.
As Cain was thinking this the waters of the pool began to stir. There was no one else near the pool but him for all the city was along the route to see the king. Cain shook his head and almost didn’t crawl down to the pool; so often had Abel beaten him there, so often had he been disappointed. But he went anyway, more out of habit than of hope. He touched the water. As he expected, nothing happened. Then the shaded water of the pool began to shimmer in the center as if lit by a strong beam of sunlight. From this light an angel rose up from the waters until he towered above Cain.
“Man favored by God, your day of blessing has come. What is your heart’s desire?”
Cain did not hesitate and said, “I wish that you cripple Abel’s good leg.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.